Publications

Antonio R. Sarabia II

When FTC Botches A Deal Review

While Democrats and Republicans may not agree on much. they do agree that we do not want the government interfering in the consumer market to lessen competition and hurt employees. Unfortunately. this is precisely what the Federal Trade Commission:on did when it Intervened in the recent Albertsons and Safeway merger.
Read More
Antonio R. Sarabia II

Victim Restitution: California Lawyer

California has enacted one of the country's most sophisticated legal protocols for victim restitution. It is a complex web of constitutional provisions, statutes, and cases, and it even includes official court forms.
Read More
Antonio R. Sarabia II

Cheerleading Uniforms and Copyright Separability

Copyright Lawyers Are Intimately Familiar with the doctrine of substantial similarity, but many never copyright law's useful article doctrine. The useful article doctrine, also known as the applied art doctrine, serves as an important public policy by preventing copyright holders from obtaining a back-door longer-term patent on a functional article while side-stepping the relatively high novelty and obviousness hurdles of patent examination.
Read More
Antonio R. Sarabia II

Judicial Notice, A Misunderstood Tool

Litigators often reach for doctrines such as res judicata or collateral estoppel to narrow the scope of a case. Res judicata prevents re-litigation of the same claim that was litigated in a prior case.
Read More
Antonio R. Sarabia II

Naked Licensing: Not as Rare as One May Think

In the last 10 years, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has decided two cases involving naked licensing: Barcamerica International v. Tyfield Importers (9th Cir 2002) 289 F. 3d 589, and Freecyclesunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network (9th Cir 2010) 626 F.3d 509. Most lawyers regard naked licensing as a rarity likely to involve non-profit organizations (as Freecycle did) or very small companies.
Read More
Antonio R. Sarabia II

New Decision puts Teeth in the Victims’ Right to Counsel

In November 2008, the people of California voted for a proposition known as Marsy's Law. This law expanded victims' right to restitution under the California Constitution and converted their statutory right to counsel into a constitutional right.
Read More